People v. Godfrey

142 A.D.3d 1184, 37 N.Y.S.3d 903
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Godfrey. Read the opinion of the Court — 148 A.D.3d 1364
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 28, 2016·No. 2014-00547·Published

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Brennan, J.), imposed December 11, 2013, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid, as the record fails to establish that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 267 [2011]; People v Johnson, 109 AD3d 1004 [2013]). Thus, the waiver does not preclude review of this excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Eng, P.J., Leventhal, Cohen, LaSalle and Barros, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Godfrey, 142 A.D.3d 1184, 37 N.Y.S.3d 903 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

142 A.D.3d 1184 (People v. Godfrey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Bradshaw
961 N.E.2d 645 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
People v. Johnson
109 A.D.3d 1004 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)