People v. Glover

57 A.D.3d 234, 869 N.Y.2d 400
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Glover. Read the opinion of the Court — 84 A.D.3d 977

Opinion

Following this Court’s remand (46 AD3d 362 [2007]), the hearing court properly denied defendant’s suppression motion. There is no basis for disturbing the credibility determinations made by a judicial hearing officer and adopted by the court, including the finding that the open container violation at issue occurred in a public place and that the arresting officers learned that defendant was wanted on two outstanding warrants. The inventory search of defendant’s bag was properly executed pursuant to established Police Department procedure, was supported by sufficient documentation and was not conducted as a [235]*235ruse to discover incriminating evidence (see People v Johnson, 1 NY3d 252, 256 [2003]). Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Saxe and Catterson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Glover, 57 A.D.3d 234, 869 N.Y.2d 400 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

57 A.D.3d 234 (People v. Glover) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. JOHNSON (JAMES)
803 N.E.2d 385 (New York Court of Appeals, 2003)