People v. Glover
489 N.E.2d 765, 66 N.Y.2d 931, 498 N.Y.S.2d 796, 1985 N.Y. LEXIS 18239
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (107 AD2d 821). In addition, we would note that unlike People v Warren (66 NY2d 831) the defendant here came dangerously close to the accomplishment of the act in view of his seizure of the victim and the circumstances surrounding the seizure.
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander and Titone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Glover, 489 N.E.2d 765, 66 N.Y.2d 931, 498 N.Y.S.2d 796, 1985 N.Y. LEXIS 18239 (N.Y. 1985).
489 N.E.2d 765 (People v. Glover) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Wise
49 A.D.3d 1198 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
People v. Jenks
239 A.D.2d 673 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
People v. Garcia
207 A.D.2d 718 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
People v. Kaplan
191 A.D.2d 712 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Hughes v. State
600 N.E.2d 130 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1992)
People v. Johnson
181 A.D.2d 914 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
People v. Kelly
166 A.D.2d 195 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
People v. Byrdsong
133 A.D.2d 164 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
People v. Prise
135 Misc. 2d 363 (New York Supreme Court, 1987)