People v. Glover

457 N.E.2d 783, 60 N.Y.2d 783, 469 N.Y.S.2d 677, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3475
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 25, 1983
StatusPublished
Cited by27 cases

This text of 457 N.E.2d 783 (People v. Glover) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Glover, 457 N.E.2d 783, 60 N.Y.2d 783, 469 N.Y.S.2d 677, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3475 (N.Y. 1983).

Opinion

[785]*785OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

The trial court’s limited closure of the courtroom during the testimony of complainant in this rape case did not constitute an abuse of discretion or a denial of defendant’s right to a public trial. The Trial Judge, having presided over defendant’s previous trial on the same charges, knew of the embarrassing nature of complainant’s testimony and was aware, in addition, of the “traffic” caused by courthouse employees who, out of curiosity, tended to come in and out of the courtroom during such testimony. No spectator was present at the time the closure order issued, nor was anyone seeking to gain admittance. There is no indication that the court excluded or intended to exclude any member of the public who sought to attend the trial; indeed, the court informed defendant that anyone whom he desired to be present would be admitted to the courtroom. Under the circumstances here presented, the court’s efforts to prevent disruption in the courtroom during complainant’s sensitive testimony provides no basis upon which to upset defendant’s conviction.

Moreover, no reversible error occurred in the People’s questioning of defendant concerning prior testimony of a codefendant on the first trial, inasmuch as the substance of the prior testimony was not introduced. With regard to the prosecutor’s questions regarding that prior testimony, no motion to strike or request for curative instructions was made. Accordingly, no further issue is presented for our review. Defendant’s remaining contentions, insofar as they are preserved, are without merit.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

The People v. Hanza Muhammad
New York Court of Appeals, 2023
People v. Muhammad
2022 NY Slip Op 03598 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
BOOP, AARON M., PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014
People v. Boop
118 A.D.3d 1273 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
People v. Cajigas
288 A.D.2d 51 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
People v. Kaufman
288 A.D.2d 895 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
People v. Lanhorn
283 A.D.2d 254 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
James Williams v. Christopher Artuz
237 F.3d 147 (Second Circuit, 2001)
People v. Jones
185 Misc. 2d 899 (New York Supreme Court, 2000)
People v. Chase
265 A.D.2d 844 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
People v. Perez
245 A.D.2d 71 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
People v. Williams
223 A.D.2d 491 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
People v. Gutierez
209 A.D.2d 217 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
People v. Ramos
203 A.D.2d 599 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
People v. Vredenburg
200 A.D.2d 797 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
People v. Cosentino
198 A.D.2d 294 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
People v. Rodriguez
196 A.D.2d 775 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
People v. Peterson
611 N.E.2d 284 (New York Court of Appeals, 1993)
People v. Clemons
574 N.E.2d 1039 (New York Court of Appeals, 1991)
People v. Clemons
162 A.D.2d 948 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
457 N.E.2d 783, 60 N.Y.2d 783, 469 N.Y.S.2d 677, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3475, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-glover-ny-1983.