People v. Glass

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Glass

275 A.D.2d 851

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 16, 1949

StatusPublished

This text of 275 A.D.2d 851 (People v. Glass) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Glass, 275 A.D.2d 851 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1949).

Pincite

Opinion

Consideration of all factors leads to the conclusion that remission of the forfeiture was an improvident exercise of discretion. The willful default herein, and the effect thereof, tending, as it does, to bring the administration of justice into disrepute, may not be disregarded. (People v. Rigby, 293 N. Y. 912; People v. Schwarze, 168 App. Div. 124, 126; People v. Licenziata, 230 App. Div. 358, affd. 256 N. Y. 534; People v. Angolette, 267 App. Div. 996.) Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Consideration of all factors leads to the conclusion that remission of the forfeiture was an improvident exercise of discretion. The willful default herein, and the effect thereof, tending, as it does, to bring the administration of justice into disrepute, may not be disregarded. (People v. Rigby, 293 N. Y. 912; People v. Schwarze, 168 App. Div. 124, 126; People v. Licenziata, 230 App. Div. 358, affd. 256 N. Y. 534; People v. Angolette, 267 App. Div. 996.) Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

275 A.D.2d 851, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-glass-nyappdiv-1949.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack