People v. Glanville

2020 NY Slip Op 1078, 115 N.Y.S.3d 899, 180 A.D.3d 803

Opinion

People v Glanville (2020 NY Slip Op 01078)

People v Glanville

2020 NY Slip Op 01078

Decided on February 13, 2020

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on February 13, 2020 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
ALAN D. SCHEINKMAN, P.J.
COLLEEN D. DUFFY
BETSY BARROS
PAUL WOOTEN, JJ.

2018-02941
(Ind. No. 2942/15)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Maurice Glanville, appellant.

Paul Skip Laisure, New York, NY (Martin B. Sawyer of counsel), for appellant.

Melinda Katz, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (John M. Castellano, Johnnette Traill, and Michael J. Curtis of counsel), for respondent.

DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Ira H. Margulis, J.), rendered January 17, 2018, convicting him of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing (Steven W. Paynter, J.), of those branches of the defendant's omnibus motion which were to suppress physical evidence and statements he made to law enforcement officials.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The record demonstrates that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see People v Sanders, 25 NY3d 337, 339-342; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256-257). The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes this Court's review of his challenge to the Supreme Court's suppression determination (see People v Kemp, 94 NY2d 831, 833; People v Garcia, 175 AD3d 612).

SCHEINKMAN, P.J., DUFFY, BARROS and WOOTEN, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court