People v. Gladstone

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Gladstone

239 A.D.2d 206, 658 N.Y.S.2d 7, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5275

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 13, 1997

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 239 A.D.2d 206 (People v. Gladstone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Gladstone, 239 A.D.2d 206, 658 N.Y.S.2d 7, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5275 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward McLaughlin, J.), rendered June 30, 1994, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of 3 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

The existing record, which defendant has not amplified by way of a motion to vacate the judgment, belies defendant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, since the record shows that defense counsel discussed defendant’s various legal rights with him (see, People v Love, 57 NY2d 998, 1000). Defense counsel procured an extremely favorable plea bargain for defendant (see, People v Ford, 86 NY2d 397, 404), and defendant was well-advised to accept the generous offer prior to a determination on his motion to suppress, since a denial of the motion could have led to withdrawal of the offer (People v Strempack, 71 NY2d 1015). Concur—Ellerin, J. P., Wallach, Rubin and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward McLaughlin, J.), rendered June 30, 1994, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of 3 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

The existing record, which defendant has not amplified by way of a motion to vacate the judgment, belies defendant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, since the record shows that defense counsel discussed defendant’s various legal rights with him (see, People v Love, 57 NY2d 998, 1000). Defense counsel procured an extremely favorable plea bargain for defendant (see, People v Ford, 86 NY2d 397, 404), and defendant was well-advised to accept the generous offer prior to a determination on his motion to suppress, since a denial of the motion could have led to withdrawal of the offer (People v Strempack, 71 NY2d 1015). Concur—Ellerin, J. P., Wallach, Rubin and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

239 A.D.2d 206, 658 N.Y.S.2d 7, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5275, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-gladstone-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack