People v. Gladden

135 A.D.3d 563, 22 N.Y.S.3d 849
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 19, 2016·No. 16675 3963/11·Published

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Renee A. White, J., at suppression hearing; Daniel P. FitzGerald, J., at jury trial and sentencing), rendered May 4, 2012, convicting defendant of two counts of burglary in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to concurrent terms of 10 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s credibility determinations. While the facts of the crime may have been unusual, we do not find that the victim’s testimony was implausible. We note that the victim’s account was corroborated by, among other things, the recovery of his keys from the police car in which defendant was transported after being arrested.

Although the search of defendant’s backpack was not justified as a search incident to arrest or as an inventory search, any error in receiving the items recovered from the backpack was harmless (see People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230, 235 [1975]). Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Acosta, Andrias and Moskowitz, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Gladden, 135 A.D.3d 563, 22 N.Y.S.3d 849 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

135 A.D.3d 563 (People v. Gladden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Danielson
880 N.E.2d 1 (New York Court of Appeals, 2007)
People v. Crimmins
326 N.E.2d 787 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)