People v. Gjenashaj

202 N.Y.S.3d 463, 223 A.D.3d 914, 2024 NY Slip Op 00432
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 31, 2024
DocketInd. No. 137/18
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 202 N.Y.S.3d 463 (People v. Gjenashaj) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Gjenashaj, 202 N.Y.S.3d 463, 223 A.D.3d 914, 2024 NY Slip Op 00432 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

People v Gjenashaj (2024 NY Slip Op 00432)
People v Gjenashaj
2024 NY Slip Op 00432
Decided on January 31, 2024
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on January 31, 2024 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
COLLEEN D. DUFFY, J.P.
JOSEPH J. MALTESE
DEBORAH A. DOWLING
HELEN VOUTSINAS, JJ.

2022-03740
(Ind. No. 137/18)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Lori Gjenashaj, appellant.


Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Russ Altman-Merino of counsel), for appellant.

Michael E. McMahon, District Attorney, Staten Island, NY (Timothy Pezzoli and James J. Gandia of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by her motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Mario F. Mattei, J.), imposed April 21, 2022, upon her plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The record demonstrates that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived her right to appeal (see People v Thomas, 34 NY3d 545; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248). The defendant's valid waiver of her right to appeal precludes appellate review of her contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d at 255).

DUFFY, J.P., MALTESE, DOWLING and VOUTSINAS, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Darrell M. Joseph

Acting Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Finley
2025 NY Slip Op 00667 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
People v. Fowler
2024 NY Slip Op 05987 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
People v. Guerra
2024 NY Slip Op 04978 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
People v. Shaw
2024 NY Slip Op 04214 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
People v. Dimas
2024 NY Slip Op 03494 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
202 N.Y.S.3d 463, 223 A.D.3d 914, 2024 NY Slip Op 00432, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-gjenashaj-nyappdiv-2024.