People v. Gittelson

22 A.D.2d 789, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2717
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Gittelson. Read the opinion of the Court — 25 A.D.2d 265

Opinion

Motion for a change of venue from the Supreme Court of New York County to a county outside the City of New York, pursuant to subdivision 2 of section 346 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, denied. The papers do not establish that defendant could not obtain a fair trial in the County of New York, or that he would not obtain as fair a trial in the County of New York as he could elsewhere in the State of New York. Moreover, since defendant’s contentions relate only to the recent surge of publicity in connection with the ease, even this consideration — if conceivably it were given the weight defendant would ascribe to it — can be obviated by the trial not proceeding earlier than January 15, 1965. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Stevens and Eager, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Gittelson, 22 A.D.2d 789, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2717 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

22 A.D.2d 789 (People v. Gittelson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.