People v. Giroux

New York Supreme Court

People v. Giroux

36 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 248

DecidedFebruary 15, 1883

StatusPublished

This text of 36 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 248 (People v. Giroux) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Giroux, 36 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 248 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1883).

Pincite

Opinion

Dykman, J.:

This action is for the suspension and removal of the defendant from the office of president of a fire insurance company on allegations of misconduct. The cause was tried at Special Term, and decided in favor of the defendant, who was awarded an additional allowance of $500. From this order granting the allowance we have this appeal. This order must stand under the provisions of section 3253 of the Code of Civil Procedure, or it must fall. Under that section an allowance can be made in certain specified kinds of actions, or in a difficult and extraordinary case where a defense has been interposed in any actions, of a sum not exceeding five per centum on the sum recovered or claimed, or the value of the subject-matter involved. In this action nothing was recovered or claimed, and no subject-matter was involved having any pecuniary value. The subject involved was the conduct of the defendant. There is, therefore, no basis for an additional allowance. It is true there was an allegation that certain amounts of money had been lost by the mismanagement of the defendant, but the plaintiff claimed no interest in it, and the action was not for its recovery.

The order should be reversed, with costs and disbursements.

Cullen, J"., concurred; Barnard, P. J., not sitting.

Order granting allowance reversed, with costs and disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dykman, J.:

This action is for the suspension and removal of the defendant from the office of president of a fire insurance company on allegations of misconduct. The cause was tried at Special Term, and decided in favor of the defendant, who was awarded an additional allowance of $500. From this order granting the allowance we have this appeal. This order must stand under the provisions of section 3253 of the Code of Civil Procedure, or it must fall. Under that section an allowance can be made in certain specified kinds of actions, or in a difficult and extraordinary case where a defense has been interposed in any actions, of a sum not exceeding five per centum on the sum recovered or claimed, or the value of the subject-matter involved. In this action nothing was recovered or claimed, and no subject-matter was involved having any pecuniary value. The subject involved was the conduct of the defendant. There is, therefore, no basis for an additional allowance. It is true there was an allegation that certain amounts of money had been lost by the mismanagement of the defendant, but the plaintiff claimed no interest in it, and the action was not for its recovery.

The order should be reversed, with costs and disbursements.

Cullen, J"., concurred; Barnard, P. J., not sitting.

Order granting allowance reversed, with costs and disbursements.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

36 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-giroux-nysupct-1883.