People v. Girard

188 A.D.2d 1020, 592 N.Y.S.2d 996, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14860

This text of 188 A.D.2d 1020 (People v. Girard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Girard, 188 A.D.2d 1020, 592 N.Y.S.2d 996, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14860 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him of sodomy in the first degree and endangering the welfare of a child, defendant contends that he was denied effective assistance of counsel and that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the conviction. The contentions are without merit. Defendant was provided meaningful representation (see, People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137). The trial evidence was sufficient and the verdict is supported by the weight of evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Wolfgang, J. — Sodomy, 1st Degree.) Present — Boomer, J. P., Green, Balio, Boehm and Fallon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Baldi
429 N.E.2d 400 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
People v. Bleakley
508 N.E.2d 672 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
188 A.D.2d 1020, 592 N.Y.S.2d 996, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14860, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-girard-nyappdiv-1992.