People v. Gioia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Gioia

117 A.D.2d 751, 499 N.Y.S.2d 371, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 53025

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 18, 1986

StatusPublished

This text of 117 A.D.2d 751 (People v. Gioia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Gioia, 117 A.D.2d 751, 499 N.Y.S.2d 371, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 53025 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from three judgments of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Sherman, J.), all rendered June 6, 1984, convicting him of grand larceny in the third degree under indictment No. 4268/83, and attempted grand larceny in the second degree (two counts) [752]*752under indictments Nos. 4269/83 and 4384/83 (one count as to each indictment), upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Judgments affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Mollen, P. J., Gibbons, Brown, Niehoff and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from three judgments of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Sherman, J.), all rendered June 6, 1984, convicting him of grand larceny in the third degree under indictment No. 4268/83, and attempted grand larceny in the second degree (two counts) [752]*752under indictments Nos. 4269/83 and 4384/83 (one count as to each indictment), upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Judgments affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Mollen, P. J., Gibbons, Brown, Niehoff and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

117 A.D.2d 751, 499 N.Y.S.2d 371, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 53025, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-gioia-nyappdiv-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack