People v. Ginyard

45 A.D.3d 268, 845 N.Y.S.2d 21
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Ginyard. Read the opinion of the Court — 16 A.D.3d 239

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Arlene Silverman, J.), entered on or about June 9, 2005, which adjudicated defendant a level three sex offender under the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The People met their burden of establishing, by clear and convincing evidence, risk factors bearing a sufficient total point score to support a level three sex offender adjudication. At the very least, defendant’s prison disciplinary record clearly war[269]*269ranted assessment of 10 points under the risk factor for conduct while confined (see People v Chabrier, 38 AD3d 355 [2007], lv denied 9 NY3d 801 [2007]), and these points alone, when added to 100 undisputed points, brought him up to the level three threshold. We have considered and rejected defendant’s remaining arguments. Concur—Tom, J.P., Saxe, Sullivan, Gonzalez and Sweeny, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Ginyard, 45 A.D.3d 268, 845 N.Y.S.2d 21 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

45 A.D.3d 268 (People v. Ginyard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Chabrier
38 A.D.3d 355 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)