People v. Gingold

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Gingold

51 A.D.2d 708, 380 N.Y.S.2d 24, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11159

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 19, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 51 A.D.2d 708 (People v. Gingold) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Gingold, 51 A.D.2d 708, 380 N.Y.S.2d 24, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11159 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, rendered October 13, 1970, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of possession of a weapon as a misdemeanor and sentencing him to a one-year term of imprisonment, unanimously modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing said sentence to a three-year period of probation; and remanding the matter to Suprem Court, New York County, for a specification of the conditions of such sentence and for proceedings to direct defendant to surrender himself to said court in order that execution of the judgment be commenced or resumed. Except as so modified, the judgment is affirmed. Following his conviction in 1970, defendant served two days in the penitentiary before his release on $50 cash bail upon a certificate of reasonable doubt. He filed a timely notice of appeal, failed to prosecute the same and, for reasons not revealed by the instant record, was never requested to surrender until five years later. He was then again admitted to bail, on consent of the District Attorney, pending determination of this appeal which was set down for a term certain. Defendant is currently serving a five-year sentence of probation on an unrelated crime committed in Westchester County in April, 1975. The probation report submitted in connection with said sentence discloses that defendant has "deep-seated emotional problems”, but "is currently taking positive steps to make a satisfactory adjustment to the community.” In view of the serious efforts being made by the Westchester County Court to assist in the ultimate rehabilitation of defendant, and in view of the considerable delay herein, we believe the interests of justice would best be served by modifying the sentence as above indicated. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Murphy, Lupiano, Silverman and Yesawich, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, rendered October 13, 1970, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of possession of a weapon as a misdemeanor and sentencing him to a one-year term of imprisonment, unanimously modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing said sentence to a three-year period of probation; and remanding the matter to Suprem Court, New York County, for a specification of the conditions of such sentence and for proceedings to direct defendant to surrender himself to said court in order that execution of the judgment be commenced or resumed. Except as so modified, the judgment is affirmed. Following his conviction in 1970, defendant served two days in the penitentiary before his release on $50 cash bail upon a certificate of reasonable doubt. He filed a timely notice of appeal, failed to prosecute the same and, for reasons not revealed by the instant record, was never requested to surrender until five years later. He was then again admitted to bail, on consent of the District Attorney, pending determination of this appeal which was set down for a term certain. Defendant is currently serving a five-year sentence of probation on an unrelated crime committed in Westchester County in April, 1975. The probation report submitted in connection with said sentence discloses that defendant has "deep-seated emotional problems”, but "is currently taking positive steps to make a satisfactory adjustment to the community.” In view of the serious efforts being made by the Westchester County Court to assist in the ultimate rehabilitation of defendant, and in view of the considerable delay herein, we believe the interests of justice would best be served by modifying the sentence as above indicated. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Murphy, Lupiano, Silverman and Yesawich, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

51 A.D.2d 708, 380 N.Y.S.2d 24, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11159, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-gingold-nyappdiv-1976.