People v. Gilmore

270 A.D.2d 286, 704 N.Y.S.2d 603, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2452
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Gilmore. Read the opinion of the Court — 252 A.D.2d 742

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Robinson, J.), rendered July 22, 1997, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, he was not entitled to a missing witness charge with respect to a police sergeant who was part of the field team in a so-called “buy and bust” operation. The defendant failed to establish that the witness was knowledgeable about a material issue pending in the case, i.e., the defendant’s identity as the perpetrator (see, People v Kitching, 78 NY2d 532).

. The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Santucci, J. P., Altman, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Gilmore, 270 A.D.2d 286, 704 N.Y.S.2d 603, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2452 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

270 A.D.2d 286 (People v. Gilmore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Kitching
583 N.E.2d 944 (New York Court of Appeals, 1991)