People v. Gilmore

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Gilmore

194 A.D.2d 803, 599 N.Y.S.2d 1019

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 28, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 194 A.D.2d 803 (People v. Gilmore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Gilmore, 194 A.D.2d 803, 599 N.Y.S.2d 1019 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant (1) from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Namm, J.), rendered February 19, 1992, convicting him of attempted burglary in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and (2) from an amended judgment of the same court, also imposed February 19, 1992, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court (Mazzei, J.), upon a finding that he violated a condition thereof, upon his admission, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon his previous conviction of attempted burglary in the second degree.

Ordered that the judgment and amended judgment are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Mangano, P. J., Rosenblatt, Lawrence, Copertino and Joy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant (1) from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Namm, J.), rendered February 19, 1992, convicting him of attempted burglary in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and (2) from an amended judgment of the same court, also imposed February 19, 1992, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court (Mazzei, J.), upon a finding that he violated a condition thereof, upon his admission, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon his previous conviction of attempted burglary in the second degree.

Ordered that the judgment and amended judgment are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Mangano, P. J., Rosenblatt, Lawrence, Copertino and Joy, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

194 A.D.2d 803, 599 N.Y.S.2d 1019, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-gilmore-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack