People v. Gillispie

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Gillispie

126 A.D.2d 564, 510 N.Y.S.2d 682, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 41697

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 12, 1987

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 126 A.D.2d 564 (People v. Gillispie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Gillispie, 126 A.D.2d 564, 510 N.Y.S.2d 682, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 41697 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kuffner, J.), rendered December 13, 1983, convicting him of attempted robbery in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant knowingly and voluntarily waived his constitutional rights in pleading guilty (see, People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9). Further, he received the sentence he was promised (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). The sentencing court was not required to hold a hearing on the issue of whether the defendant was a prior violent felony offender in that he admittedly had been previously so adjudicated (CPL 400.15 [8]; People v Loughlin, 66 NY2d 633). Thompson, J. P., Niehoff, Weinstein, Kunzeman and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kuffner, J.), rendered December 13, 1983, convicting him of attempted robbery in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant knowingly and voluntarily waived his constitutional rights in pleading guilty (see, People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9). Further, he received the sentence he was promised (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). The sentencing court was not required to hold a hearing on the issue of whether the defendant was a prior violent felony offender in that he admittedly had been previously so adjudicated (CPL 400.15 [8]; People v Loughlin, 66 NY2d 633). Thompson, J. P., Niehoff, Weinstein, Kunzeman and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

126 A.D.2d 564, 510 N.Y.S.2d 682, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 41697, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-gillispie-nyappdiv-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack