Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Gillespie

People v. Gillespie

88 A.D.3d 539, 931 N.Y.2d 217
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 18, 2011
StatusPublished

This text of 88 A.D.3d 539 (People v. Gillespie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Gillespie, 88 A.D.3d 539, 931 N.Y.2d 217 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

The resentencing proceeding imposing the mandatory minimum term of postrelease supervision was neither barred by double jeopardy nor otherwise unlawful (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621 [2011]). We have no authority to revisit defendant’s prison sentence on this appeal (see id. at 635). Concur — Mazzarelli, J.E, Moskowitz, Acosta, Renwick and DeGrasse, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Lingle
949 N.E.2d 952 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
88 A.D.3d 539, 931 N.Y.2d 217, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-gillespie-nyappdiv-2011.