People v. Gillespi

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Gillespi

202 N.E.2d 565, 15 N.Y.2d 529, 254 N.Y.S.2d 121, 1964 N.Y. LEXIS 908

DecidedOctober 15, 1964

StatusPublished

This text of 202 N.E.2d 565 (People v. Gillespi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Gillespi, 202 N.E.2d 565, 15 N.Y.2d 529, 254 N.Y.S.2d 121, 1964 N.Y. LEXIS 908 (N.Y. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgments affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye,.Van Voorhis, Bubke and Scílbppi. Judges Fuld and Bergan"dissent and, vote to reverse (1) upon the ground that subdivision 7 of section 887 of the ..Code of Criminal Procedure violates the due process clause of.,the Fourteenth Amendment of the Federal Constitution because of its vagueness and indefiniteness, and ,(2) upon the, further ground that, in any event, the acts charged against defendants are'-not encompassed within the, design ,,or meaning of the statute.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgments affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye,.Van Voorhis, Bubke and Scílbppi. Judges Fuld and Bergan"dissent and, vote to reverse (1) upon the ground that subdivision 7 of section 887 of the ..Code of Criminal Procedure violates the due process clause of.,the Fourteenth Amendment of the Federal Constitution because of its vagueness and indefiniteness, and ,(2) upon the, further ground that, in any event, the acts charged against defendants are'-not encompassed within the, design ,,or meaning of the statute.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

202 N.E.2d 565, 15 N.Y.2d 529, 254 N.Y.S.2d 121, 1964 N.Y. LEXIS 908, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-gillespi-ny-1964.