People v. Gillard

101 A.D.3d 899, 954 N.Y.2d 894
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Gillard. Read the opinion of the Court — 126 A.D.3d 1285

Opinion

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the resentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Eng, P.J., Angiolillo, Balkin and Sgroi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Gillard, 101 A.D.3d 899, 954 N.Y.2d 894 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

101 A.D.3d 899 (People v. Gillard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)