People v. Gill
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Parker, J.), rendered May 2, 2006, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts), upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Mastro, J.P., Fisher, Miller, Dickerson and Chambers, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
62 A.D.3d 811 (People v. Gill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.