People v. Gill

7 Cal. 356
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1857
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 7 Cal. 356 (People v. Gill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Gill, 7 Cal. 356 (Cal. 1857).

Opinion

Murray, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court—Burnett, J., concurring.

The appellant was convicted of manslaughter. The offence was committed on the twenty-second day of March, 1856. On the nineteenth of April, 1856, the act concerning crimes and punishments was amended, and the punishment for various crimes was altered.

It is now contended that there is no law by which the prisoner can be punished. If the old law had been repealed and no provisions made for past offences, then, undoubtedly, he would have to be discharged; but the tenth section of the act of 1856 contains a saving clause, to the effect that nothing contained therein shall apply to the trial of persons indicted for offences committed prior to the amended act. In all such cases, the punishment shall be fixed in accordance with the laws heretofore existing.”

v The appellant was indicted, tried, convicted, and sentenced, under the old law. The judgment is regular, and must be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

P. v. Britton CA6
California Court of Appeal, 2013
Governing Board of Rialto Unified School District v. Mann
558 P.2d 1 (California Supreme Court, 1977)
State v. Newcomb
109 P. 355 (Washington Supreme Court, 1910)
People v. McNulty
28 P. 816 (California Supreme Court, 1891)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
7 Cal. 356, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-gill-cal-1857.