People v. Gilette

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Gilette

2016 NY Slip Op 8374, 145 A.D.3d 796, 41 N.Y.S.3d 916

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 14, 2016

Docket2015-11418

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 2016 NY Slip Op 8374 (People v. Gilette) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Gilette, 2016 NY Slip Op 8374, 145 A.D.3d 796, 41 N.Y.S.3d 916 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the Supreme Court, *797 Queens County (Wong, J.), rendered October 14, 2015, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court (Chin Brandt, J.), upon a finding that he violated conditions thereof, upon his admission, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon his previous conviction of vehicular manslaughter in the second degree.

Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the sentence imposed upon the revocation of probation was not excessive (see People v Hobson, 43 AD3d 1179, 1180 [2007]; People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982])-

Dillon, J.P., Dickerson, Maltese and Duffy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the Supreme Court, *797 Queens County (Wong, J.), rendered October 14, 2015, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court (Chin Brandt, J.), upon a finding that he violated conditions thereof, upon his admission, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon his previous conviction of vehicular manslaughter in the second degree.

Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the sentence imposed upon the revocation of probation was not excessive (see People v Hobson, 43 AD3d 1179, 1180 [2007]; People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982])-

Dillon, J.P., Dickerson, Maltese and Duffy, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2016 NY Slip Op 8374, 145 A.D.3d 796, 41 N.Y.S.3d 916, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-gilette-nyappdiv-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack