People v. Giles

190 A.D.2d 1022, 594 N.Y.S.2d 1002, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1220

This text of 190 A.D.2d 1022 (People v. Giles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Giles, 190 A.D.2d 1022, 594 N.Y.S.2d 1002, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1220 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject defendant’s contention that he was denied effective assistance of counsel (see, People v Rivera, 71 NY2d 705, 708-709). Defendant’s arguments concerning the submission of the verdict sheet to the jury and the court’s charge on reasonable doubt are unpreserved and we decline to reach them in the interest of justice. We have examined defendant’s remaining arguments on appeal and find them to be lacking in merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Onondaga County Court, Burke, J. — Burglary, 2nd Degree.) Present— Boomer, J. P., Pine, Lawton, Boehm and Fallon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Rivera
525 N.E.2d 698 (New York Court of Appeals, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
190 A.D.2d 1022, 594 N.Y.S.2d 1002, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-giles-nyappdiv-1993.