People v. Giesea
61 Cal. 53, 1882 Cal. LEXIS 535
Opinion
Information for bigamy. The Court sustained the demur[54]*54rer to the information on the ground that it does not state at what place the defendant was first married. But in this respect the District Attorney appears to have followed the precedents given by Archbold and Wharton, and we do not think that the code requires anything more.
Judgment reversed and cause remanded, with directions to the Court below to overrule the demurrer, with leave to the defendant to plead to the information.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Giesea, 61 Cal. 53, 1882 Cal. LEXIS 535 (Cal. 1882).
61 Cal. 53 (People v. Giesea) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Ellis
266 P. 518 (California Supreme Court, 1928)
Ford v. State
192 P. 1117 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1920)
People v. Priestley
118 P. 965 (California Court of Appeal, 1911)