People v. Gibson-Parish
This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 6453 (People v. Gibson-Parish) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (W. Miller, J.), rendered October 29, 2015, convicting him of attempted robbery in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s contentions concerning two orders of protection issued at the time of sentencing survive his valid waiver of the right to appeal (see People v Bernardini, 142 AD3d 671 [2016]; People v Kumar, 127 AD3d 882 [2015]; People v Smith, 112 AD3d 759 [2013]; People v Morrisohn, 111 AD3d 853 [2013]; People v Cedeno, 107 AD3d 734 [2013]). However, the defendant’s contentions regarding the orders of protection are unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Nieves, 2 NY3d 310 [2004]; People v Mitchell, 142 AD3d 1185 [2016]; People v Bernardini, 142 AD3d 671 [2016]; People v May, 138 AD3d 1146 [2016]; People v O’Connor, 136 AD3d 945 [2016]; People v Hunter, 135 AD3d 958 [2016]; People v Fortier, 130 AD3d 642 [2015]), and we decline to review them in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction. “[T]he better practice — and best use of judicial resources — is for a defendant seeking adjustment of [final orders of protection] to request relief from the issuing court in the first instance, resorting to the appellate courts only if necessary” (People v Nieves, 2 NY3d at 317).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2017 NY Slip Op 6453, 153 A.D.3d 1273, 59 N.Y.S.3d 702, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-gibson-parish-nyappdiv-2017.