People v. Germinario

2025 NY Slip Op 01946
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 2, 2025
DocketInd. No. 72367/22
StatusPublished

This text of 2025 NY Slip Op 01946 (People v. Germinario) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Germinario, 2025 NY Slip Op 01946 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

People v Germinario (2025 NY Slip Op 01946)
People v Germinario
2025 NY Slip Op 01946
Decided on April 2, 2025
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on April 2, 2025 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
BETSY BARROS, J.P.
ANGELA G. IANNACCI
LILLIAN WAN
DONNA-MARIE E. GOLIA, JJ.

2023-05358
(Ind. No. 72367/22)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Kira Germinario, appellant.


Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Joshua M. Levine of counsel), for appellant.

Melinda Katz, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (Johnnette Traill and Nancy Fitzpatrick Talcott of counsel; Brendan Ransom on the brief), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Michael J. Yavinsky, J.), rendered May 10, 2023, convicting her of robbery in the third degree, upon her plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the record demonstrates that she knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived her right to appeal (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256; People v Poncedeleon, _____ AD3d _____, 2025 NY Slip Op 00675). The defendant's valid waiver of her right to appeal precludes appellate review of her contentions that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d at 255-256; People v Lowe, 216 AD3d 670, 671) and that the mandatory surcharge and fees imposed at sentencing should be waived pursuant to CPL 420.35(2-a) (see People v Malary, 213 AD3d 774, 775; People v Martinez, 210 AD3d 1008, 1008).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment.

BARROS, J.P., IANNACCI, WAN and GOLIA, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Darrell M. Joseph

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Martinez
210 A.D.3d 1008 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
People v. Lowe
216 A.D.3d 670 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
People v. Poncedeleon
2025 NY Slip Op 00675 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2025 NY Slip Op 01946, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-germinario-nyappdiv-2025.