People v. Gerena

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Gerena

21 A.D.3d 885, 800 N.Y.S.2d 511, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8951

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 6, 2005

StatusPublished

This text of 21 A.D.3d 885 (People v. Gerena) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Gerena, 21 A.D.3d 885, 800 N.Y.S.2d 511, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8951 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Suffolk County (Braslow, J), dated October 29, 2003, which, after a hearing pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C, adjudicated him a level three sex offender.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The application of New York’s Sex Offender Registration Act (see Correction Law § 168 et seq.) to the defendant, who committed sex crimes before its effective date, was proper (see People v Hernandez, 264 AD2d 783 [1999]; Doe v Pataki, 120 F3d 1263, 1285 [1997], cert denied 522 US 1122 [1998]).

[886]*886The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Adams, J.P., Ritter, Goldstein and Fisher, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Suffolk County (Braslow, J), dated October 29, 2003, which, after a hearing pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C, adjudicated him a level three sex offender.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The application of New York’s Sex Offender Registration Act (see Correction Law § 168 et seq.) to the defendant, who committed sex crimes before its effective date, was proper (see People v Hernandez, 264 AD2d 783 [1999]; Doe v Pataki, 120 F3d 1263, 1285 [1997], cert denied 522 US 1122 [1998]).

[886]*886The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Adams, J.P., Ritter, Goldstein and Fisher, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 A.D.3d 885, 800 N.Y.S.2d 511, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8951, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-gerena-nyappdiv-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack