People v. Gerena

21 A.D.3d 885, 800 N.Y.S.2d 511, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8951
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Gerena. Read the opinion of the Court — 49 A.D.3d 1204

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Suffolk County (Braslow, J), dated October 29, 2003, which, after a hearing pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C, adjudicated him a level three sex offender.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The application of New York’s Sex Offender Registration Act (see Correction Law § 168 et seq.) to the defendant, who committed sex crimes before its effective date, was proper (see People v Hernandez, 264 AD2d 783 [1999]; Doe v Pataki, 120 F3d 1263, 1285 [1997], cert denied 522 US 1122 [1998]).

[886]*886The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Adams, J.P., Ritter, Goldstein and Fisher, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Gerena, 21 A.D.3d 885, 800 N.Y.S.2d 511, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8951 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

21 A.D.3d 885 (People v. Gerena) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Hernandez
264 A.D.2d 783 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)