People v. Geremonte

269 A.D.2d 291, 704 N.Y.S.2d 461, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2055

This text of 269 A.D.2d 291 (People v. Geremonte) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Geremonte, 269 A.D.2d 291, 704 N.Y.S.2d 461, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2055 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (George Roberts, J.), rendered December 14, 1995, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 4V2 to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

The present record clearly establishes that defendant forfeited the benefit of his original plea bargain where, in contravention of that bargain, he departed a court-ordered drug rehabilitation program after one day, voluntarily and against the advice of the program’s clinical staff (compare, [292]*292People v Grant, 243 AD2d 358, 359). Defendant has not shown that he is prejudiced by the missing minutes (see, People v Dunbar, 240 AD2d 275, 276, lv denied 90 NY2d 892). Concur— Sullivan, P. J., Nardelli, Wallach, Lerner and Buckley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Dunbar
240 A.D.2d 275 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
People v. Grant
243 A.D.2d 358 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
269 A.D.2d 291, 704 N.Y.S.2d 461, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2055, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-geremonte-nyappdiv-2000.