People v. Gerard (Clemence)
This text of People v. Gerard (Clemence) (People v. Gerard (Clemence)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
against
Clemence Gerard, Defendant-Appellant.
Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, Bronx County (Steven J. Hornstein, J.), rendered February 13, 2015, convicting him, after a nonjury trial, of attempted assault in the third degree, attempted criminal obstruction of breathing or blood circulation, and harassment in the second degree, and imposing sentence.
Per Curiam.
Judgment of conviction (Steven J. Hornstein, J.), rendered February 13, 2015, affirmed.
The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348—349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the trial court's determinations concerning credibility. The victim's testimony was corroborated, in part, by a second witness, the 911 call and medical records. The issues raised by defendant concerning minor inconsistencies in the testimony, the purported lack of physical evidence of the victim's injuries, and her alleged motive to fabricate her allegations were placed before the trier of fact, and we find no reason on the record before us to disturb its determination.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
I concur I concur I concur
Decision Date: May 22, 2018
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
People v. Gerard (Clemence), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-gerard-clemence-nyappterm-2018.