People v. Gerald

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Gerald

157 A.D.2d 668, 550 N.Y.S.2d 848, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 233

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 8, 1990

StatusPublished

This text of 157 A.D.2d 668 (People v. Gerald) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Gerald, 157 A.D.2d 668, 550 N.Y.S.2d 848, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 233 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the County Court, Westchester County (Nicolai, J.), both rendered September 21, 1984, convicting him of attempted burglary in the second degree under indictment No. 83-01308-01, and attempted burglary in the third degree under superior court information No. 84-00964-01, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Mangano, J. P., Kunzeman, Eiber and Balletta, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the County Court, Westchester County (Nicolai, J.), both rendered September 21, 1984, convicting him of attempted burglary in the second degree under indictment No. 83-01308-01, and attempted burglary in the third degree under superior court information No. 84-00964-01, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Mangano, J. P., Kunzeman, Eiber and Balletta, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

157 A.D.2d 668, 550 N.Y.S.2d 848, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 233, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-gerald-nyappdiv-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack