People v. George

47 A.D.2d 662, 364 N.Y.S.2d 194, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8859

This text of 47 A.D.2d 662 (People v. George) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. George, 47 A.D.2d 662, 364 N.Y.S.2d 194, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8859 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County, rendered July 5, 1973, convicting him of attempted burglary in the third degree, upon his guilty plea, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. No opinion. Cohalan, Acting P. J., Brennan, Munder and Shapiro, JJ., concur; Benjamin, J., dissents and votes to reverse the judgment and remand the case to the County Court to afford defendant the opportunity to withdraw his guilty plea, with the following memorandum: Defendant pied guilty to the crime of attempted burglary in the third degree. At the time of the guilty pleading the trial court said the following: " Other than a sentence stipulation by this Court to sentence you to a maximum sentence of incarceration, to an indeterminate sentence having a maximum term of three years; I understand that you may well be adjudicated as an addict. However, it’s strictly understood, that it will be entirely within my discretion as to whether or not I will sentence you to the three year indeterminate sentence or to the NACC, and this is all provided I feel I am able to do so after examination of your pre-sentence report. If I feel I’m unable to do so, I will give you the opportunity to withdraw your plea.” Defendant, without being given the opportunity to withdraw his plea, was sentenced to an indeterminate term of imprisonment not to exceed three years. In my opinion this was error. The only fair and reasonable interpretation of the above-quoted promise was that, if the trial court were unable to sentence defendant to the Narcotic Addiction Control Center, NACC, it would afford him the opportunity to either withdraw his guilty plea or to accept the sentence. Defendant should now be given such an opportunity.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
47 A.D.2d 662, 364 N.Y.S.2d 194, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8859, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-george-nyappdiv-1975.