People v. Gendron

71 A.D.2d 1050, 420 N.Y.S.2d 803, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13426
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 21, 1979
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 71 A.D.2d 1050 (People v. Gendron) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Gendron, 71 A.D.2d 1050, 420 N.Y.S.2d 803, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13426 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Opinion

Adjudication insofar as it imposes sentence unanimously reversed, sentence vacated and matter remitted to County Court, Onondaga County, for further proceedings in accordance with the following memorandum: With commendable candor in this case, the District Attorney acknowledges that the sentencing court should have permitted defendant to withdraw his guilty plea. The record demonstrates that defendant’s plea of guilty of burglary in the third degree was entered upon the understanding that he would be adjudicated a youthful offender and would be placed on probation. Without affording defendant an opportunity to withdraw his guilty plea, the court declined at sentencing fully to adhere to its agreement. Defendant was adjudicated a youthful offender and was sentenced to an indeterminate term of imprisonment with a maximum of four years. Before imposing a harsher sentence than that agreed upon, the sentencing court was required to afford the defendant an opportunity to withdraw his [1051]*1051guilty plea (People v Selikoff, 35 NY2d 227, 241, cert den 419 US 1122). On remand, the court may either impose the agreed sentence or offer the defendant an opportunity to withdraw his plea. As we wrote in People v Jones (70 AD2d 1054, 1055): "If the court declines to adhere to the original sentence agreement and offers defendant an opportunity to withdraw his guilty plea, the court will no longer be bound by its original agreement of sentence. If defendant is then convicted after trial or on a new plea of guilty, the court may proceed to impose the sentence which it deems appropriate”. (Appeal from adjudication of Onondaga County Court—youthful offender.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Cardamone, Simons, Callahan and Witmer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Williams
195 A.D.2d 1040 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
People v. Battaglia
78 A.D.2d 584 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
71 A.D.2d 1050, 420 N.Y.S.2d 803, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13426, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-gendron-nyappdiv-1979.