People v. Genco

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Genco

278 A.D.2d 429, 718 N.Y.S.2d 608

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 18, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 278 A.D.2d 429 (People v. Genco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Genco, 278 A.D.2d 429, 718 N.Y.S.2d 608 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Smith, J.), rendered October 2, 1998, convicting him of criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree, criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree, grand larceny in the third degree, and grand larceny in the fourth degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant received the effective assistance of counsel (see, People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708). His remaining contentions are without merit. S. Miller, J. P., Friedmann, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Smith, J.), rendered October 2, 1998, convicting him of criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree, criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree, grand larceny in the third degree, and grand larceny in the fourth degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant received the effective assistance of counsel (see, People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708). His remaining contentions are without merit. S. Miller, J. P., Friedmann, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

278 A.D.2d 429, 718 N.Y.S.2d 608, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-genco-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack