People v. Geehreng
101 A.D.3d 975, 955 N.Y.2d 530
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 19, 2012·Published·Cited by 7 cases
Opinion
The County Court properly designated the defendant a level two sex offender. Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the County Court properly assessed 15 points under risk factor 11 (Drug or Alcohol Abuse-History of Abuse) (see Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary at 15 [2006]; People v Gulley, 99 AD3d 979 [2012]; People v Deturris, 90 AD3d 727 [2011]; People v Harris, 74 AD3d 767 [2010]). Rivera, J.P., Dillon, Leventhal and Chambers, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Geehreng, 101 A.D.3d 975, 955 N.Y.2d 530 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).
101 A.D.3d 975 (People v. Geehreng) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Amaya
121 A.D.3d 874 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
People v. King
111 A.D.3d 909 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
People v. Ashby
111 A.D.3d 611 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
People v. Smith
108 A.D.3d 514 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)