People v. Gayle

2025 NY Slip Op 02942
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 14, 2025
Docket2023-07393
StatusPublished

This text of 2025 NY Slip Op 02942 (People v. Gayle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Gayle, 2025 NY Slip Op 02942 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

People v Gayle (2025 NY Slip Op 02942)
People v Gayle
2025 NY Slip Op 02942
Decided on May 14, 2025
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on May 14, 2025 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
BETSY BARROS, J.P.
LINDA CHRISTOPHER
LILLIAN WAN
JANICE A. TAYLOR, JJ.

2023-07393

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Ricardo Gayle, appellant.


Andrea S. Ferrante, Staten Island, NY, for appellant.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove, Morgan J. Dennehy, and Daniel Berman of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Matthew J. D'Emic, J.), dated July 17, 2023, which, after a hearing, designated him a level one sexually violent offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The defendant was convicted, upon his plea of guilty, of sexual abuse in the first degree. After a hearing pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), the Supreme Court assessed the defendant a total of 40 points on the risk assessment instrument and designated him a level one sexually violent offender. The defendant appeals.

The defendant's contention that he should not have been designated a sexually violent offender is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Sherron, 2 AD3d 885, 885) and, in any event, without merit (see People v Talluto, 39 NY3d 306, 315).

BARROS, J.P., CHRISTOPHER, WAN and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Darrell M. Joseph

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Sherron
2 A.D.3d 885 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2025 NY Slip Op 02942, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-gayle-nyappdiv-2025.