People v. Gaul

84 N.E. 721, 233 Ill. 630
Illinois Supreme Court·Decided April 23, 1908·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

We are of the opinion the Appellate Court should have affirmed the judgment of the county court in whole or reversed that judgment in whole. The judgment of the county court, although based upon different counts of the information, is so far a unit that it should be either reversed in whole or affirmed in whole by the Appellate Court.

The judgment of the Appellate Court will therefore be reversed and the cause remanded to that court, with directions to affirm the judgment of the county court as a whole or reverse the judgment of that court as a whole, and in case the judgment of the county court is reversed, to remand the cause to that court for a new trial.

Reversed and remanded, with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Gaul, 84 N.E. 721, 233 Ill. 630 (Ill. 1908).

84 N.E. 721 (People v. Gaul) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

The People v. Brush
155 N.E. 34 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1926)
People v. Blenz
239 Ill. App. 318 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1925)
People v. Goldberg
122 N.E. 530 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1919)
People v. Huyvaert
209 Ill. App. 40 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1918)
People v. Goldberg
210 Ill. App. 422 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1918)
People v. Sweetland
210 Ill. App. 432 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1918)
People v. Powers
200 Ill. App. 536 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1916)
People v. Gilmore
196 Ill. App. 148 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1915)