People v. Gauger
This text of 268 A.D.2d 386 (People v. Gauger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Antonio Brandveen, J., at suppression hearing; Harold Beeler, J., at plea and sentence), rendered October 29, 1996, convicting defendant of attempted burglary in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a persistent violent felony offender, to a term of 6 years to life, unanimously affirmed.
Defendant’s suppression motion was properly denied. We see no reason to disturb the court’s credibility determinations, which are supported by the record. There was no need for the police to repeat previously administered Miranda warnings prior to questioning defendant since the interrogation was within a reasonable time after the initial warnings and custody had remained continuous (see, People v Thomas, 233 AD2d 347, lv denied 89 NY2d 1102). Moreover, prior to questioning defendant, the detective showed him the Miranda form defendant had previously signed and advised him that these warnings were still in effect, whereupon defendant replied that he understood (see, People v Hotchkiss, 260 AD2d 241, lv denied 93 NY2d 1003). Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Williams, Lerner, Andrias and Friedman, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
268 A.D.2d 386, 703 N.Y.S.2d 436, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 790, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-gauger-nyappdiv-2000.