People v. Gatto

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Gatto

189 A.D.2d 780, 592 N.Y.S.2d 276, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 140

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 11, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 189 A.D.2d 780 (People v. Gatto) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Gatto, 189 A.D.2d 780, 592 N.Y.S.2d 276, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 140 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the County Court, Orange County (Byrne, J.), both rendered February 3, 1992, convicting her of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree under Indictment No. 91-410 and attempted criminal sale of a con[781]*781trolled substance in the third degree under Indictment No. 91-266, upon her pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606).

Moreover, we have examined the contentions raised in the defendant’s supplemental pro se brief and find them to be frivolous. Mangano, P. J., Sullivan, O’Brien, Ritter and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the County Court, Orange County (Byrne, J.), both rendered February 3, 1992, convicting her of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree under Indictment No. 91-410 and attempted criminal sale of a con[781]*781trolled substance in the third degree under Indictment No. 91-266, upon her pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606).

Moreover, we have examined the contentions raised in the defendant’s supplemental pro se brief and find them to be frivolous. Mangano, P. J., Sullivan, O’Brien, Ritter and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

189 A.D.2d 780, 592 N.Y.S.2d 276, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 140, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-gatto-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack