People v. Gattini

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Gattini

249 A.D. 739, 291 N.Y.S. 672, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5815

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 4, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 249 A.D. 739 (People v. Gattini) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Gattini, 249 A.D. 739, 291 N.Y.S. 672, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5815 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

The defendant, after conviction and after the judgment of conviction had been affirmed by this court [246 App. Div. 744], made a motion to vacate the judgment and for a new trial on newly-discovered evidence, which was denied in the County Court of Nassau county wherein he had been tried. An appeal was taken to this court. Appeal dismissed on the ground that the order is not appealable. (Code Crim. Proc. §§ 485, 517; People v. Trezza, 128 N. Y. 529; People v. Mayhew, 151 id. 607; Hebberd v. Loeb, 125 App. Div. 579.) The appellant asks, without formal application, for a reargument of the appeal from the judgment of conviction. An examination of the record indicates that such reargument would be futile. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Adel, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant, after conviction and after the judgment of conviction had been affirmed by this court [246 App. Div. 744], made a motion to vacate the judgment and for a new trial on newly-discovered evidence, which was denied in the County Court of Nassau county wherein he had been tried. An appeal was taken to this court. Appeal dismissed on the ground that the order is not appealable. (Code Crim. Proc. §§ 485, 517; People v. Trezza, 128 N. Y. 529; People v. Mayhew, 151 id. 607; Hebberd v. Loeb, 125 App. Div. 579.) The appellant asks, without formal application, for a reargument of the appeal from the judgment of conviction. An examination of the record indicates that such reargument would be futile. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Adel, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

249 A.D. 739, 291 N.Y.S. 672, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5815, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-gattini-nyappdiv-1936.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack