People v. Gates
88 A.D.3d 740, 930 N.Y.2d 467
Opinion
The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the defendant’s motion to withdraw his plea of guilty since the record demonstrated that the defendant’s plea was knowing, voluntary, and intelligent (see People v Douglas, 83 AD3d 1092 [2011]; People v Yarborough, 83 AD3d 875 [2011]). Prudenti, EJ., Rivera, Austin and Roman, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Gates, 88 A.D.3d 740, 930 N.Y.2d 467 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).
88 A.D.3d 740 (People v. Gates) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Yarborough
83 A.D.3d 875 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
People v. Douglas
83 A.D.3d 1092 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)