People v. Gates

197 A.D.2d 861, 604 N.Y.S.2d 867, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9236
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Gates. Read the opinion of the Court — 170 A.D.2d 971

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant’s contention that the court’s justification charge was improper was not preserved for review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Patterson, 39 NY2d 288, 294, affd 432 US 197; People v Comfort, 113 AD2d 420, 426, lv denied 67 NY2d 760), and we decline to consider it in the interest of justice. Even were we to reach it, we would find defendant’s contention to be without merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Connell, J.—Manslaughter, 1st Degree.) Present—Denman, P. J., Callahan, Balio, Boomer and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Gates, 197 A.D.2d 861, 604 N.Y.S.2d 867, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9236 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

197 A.D.2d 861 (People v. Gates) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Patterson v. New York
432 U.S. 197 (Supreme Court, 1977)
People v. Patterson
347 N.E.2d 898 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)
People v. Comfort
113 A.D.2d 420 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)