People v. Gastiaburo

23 A.D.2d 891, 260 N.Y.S.2d 250, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4075
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 24, 1965·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered August 7, 1963 after a jury trial, convicting him of burglary in the third degree and possession of burglar’s instruments as a felony, and imposing sentence upon him as a second felony offender. Judgment affirmed. Section 408 of the Penal Law makes it a crime to have in one’s possession any implement commonly used for the commission of a larceny under circumstances evincing an intent to use the implement in the commission of a crime. In this ease the implements are toothpicks. Defendant’s statement to the detective shows clearly that the toothpicks were used to prevent the owner from unlocking his apartment door while the larceny was being committed. Furthermore, the statement is couched in terms implying the use of toothpicks by the defendant as a common practice to aid in the commission of a larceny. Christ, Acting P. J., Hill, Rabin, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Gastiaburo, 23 A.D.2d 891, 260 N.Y.S.2d 250, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4075 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

23 A.D.2d 891 (People v. Gastiaburo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Banister
13 Misc. 3d 764 (Criminal Court of the City of New York, 2006)
State v. Warner
696 P.2d 1052 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1985)
State v. Adkins
678 S.W.2d 855 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1984)