People v. Gary

179 A.D.2d 821
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 27, 1992·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

The defendant’s sole contention on appeal is that the hearing court erred in denying that branch of her omnibus motion [822] which was to suppress statements she made to law enforcement personnel. A review of the record discloses, however, that the defendant expressly and voluntarily waived her right to appellate review of the denial of her suppression motion by consenting to withdraw all pending and decided motions at the time her plea was entered. Accordingly, as there exists no suppression ruling to be reviewed on appeal, the judgment must be affirmed (see, People v Flores, 177 AD2d 647; People v Williams, 167 AD2d 491). Thompson, J. P., Sullivan, Harwood and O’Brien, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Gary, 179 A.D.2d 821 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

179 A.D.2d 821 (People v. Gary) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Baez
52 A.D.3d 840 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
People v. Jones
288 A.D.2d 322 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
People v. Toye
264 A.D.2d 401 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
People v. Pristell
249 A.D.2d 423 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
People v. Spearman
226 A.D.2d 180 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
People v. Bryant
225 A.D.2d 786 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
People v. Sebastian
197 A.D.2d 647 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
People v. Conte
186 A.D.2d 579 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
People v. Lantigua
179 A.D.2d 826 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)