People v. Gary
This text of 179 A.D.2d 821 (People v. Gary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant’s sole contention on appeal is that the hearing court erred in denying that branch of her omnibus motion [822]*822which was to suppress statements she made to law enforcement personnel. A review of the record discloses, however, that the defendant expressly and voluntarily waived her right to appellate review of the denial of her suppression motion by consenting to withdraw all pending and decided motions at the time her plea was entered. Accordingly, as there exists no suppression ruling to be reviewed on appeal, the judgment must be affirmed (see, People v Flores, 177 AD2d 647; People v Williams, 167 AD2d 491). Thompson, J. P., Sullivan, Harwood and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
179 A.D.2d 821, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-gary-nyappdiv-1992.