People v. Garvey
This text of 19 A.D.2d 683 (People v. Garvey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment of conviction must be reversed. The question of fact as to the sufficiency of the corroboration evidence should have been submitted to the jury. The testimony of the witnesses Brannen as [684]*684to complainant’s statements was hearsay and it was error to admit it. If it were not for the errors of law we would affirm. Judgment of conviction reversed, on the law, and a new trial ordered. Berga.n, P. J., Coon, Herlihy, Reynolds and Taylor, J.J., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
19 A.D.2d 683, 241 N.Y.S.2d 9, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3498, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-garvey-nyappdiv-1963.