People v. Garries

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Garries

299 A.D.2d 858, 749 N.Y.S.2d 200, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10833

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 2002

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 299 A.D.2d 858 (People v. Garries) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Garries, 299 A.D.2d 858, 749 N.Y.S.2d 200, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10833 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of Steuben County Court (Latham, J.), entered February 22, 2001, which revoked defendant’s probation and imposed a sentence of imprisonment.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment revoking his probation and sentencing him to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of 1 to 3 years. Contrary to the contention of defendant, the determination of County Court that he violated the terms of his probation is not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Mallory, 191 AD2d 970, lv denied 81 NY2d 1016; see generally People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). Present — Green, J.P., Hayes, Scudder, Gorski and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of Steuben County Court (Latham, J.), entered February 22, 2001, which revoked defendant’s probation and imposed a sentence of imprisonment.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment revoking his probation and sentencing him to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of 1 to 3 years. Contrary to the contention of defendant, the determination of County Court that he violated the terms of his probation is not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Mallory, 191 AD2d 970, lv denied 81 NY2d 1016; see generally People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). Present — Green, J.P., Hayes, Scudder, Gorski and Lawton, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

299 A.D.2d 858, 749 N.Y.S.2d 200, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10833, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-garries-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack