People v. Garrick

11 A.D.3d 558, 782 N.Y.S.2d 644, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12011
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Garrick. Read the opinion of the Court — 11 A.D.3d 395

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lott, J.), rendered January 14, 2003, convicting him of burglary in the first degree, robbery in the first degree, rape in the first degree, sodomy in the first degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Krausman, J.P., Luciano, Mastro and Lifson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Garrick, 11 A.D.3d 558, 782 N.Y.S.2d 644, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12011 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

11 A.D.3d 558 (People v. Garrick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Gonzalez
393 N.E.2d 987 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
People v. Paige
54 A.D.2d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)