People v. Garray

2019 NY Slip Op 1656
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 7, 2019
Docket8630 2644/04
StatusPublished

This text of 2019 NY Slip Op 1656 (People v. Garray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Garray, 2019 NY Slip Op 1656 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

People v Garray (2019 NY Slip Op 01656)
People v Garray
2019 NY Slip Op 01656
Decided on March 7, 2019
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on March 7, 2019
Renwick, J.P., Manzanet-Daniels, Tom, Kahn, Gesmer, JJ.

8630 2644/04

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

David Garray, Defendant-Appellant.


Janet E. Sabel, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Arthur H. Hopkirk of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Valerie Figueredo of counsel), for respondent.



Order Supreme Court, New York County (Richard D. Carruthers, J.), entered on or about October 16, 2014, which adjudicated defendant a level three sexually violent offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court's assessment of 20 points under the risk factor for relationship (stranger) with the victim was supported by clear and convincing evidence. The documents before the court, including the case summary, contained facts that would make no sense if defendant had been acquainted with the victims (see People v Corn, 128 AD3d 436, 437 [1st Dept 2015]).

The court providently exercised its discretion when it declined to grant a downward departure (see People v Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841 [2014]). The mitigating factors cited by defendant were

adequately taken into account by the risk assessment instrument and were outweighed in any event by the seriousness of the underlying offenses.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: MARCH 7, 2019

CLERK



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Corn
128 A.D.3d 436 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
People v. Gillotti
18 N.E.3d 701 (New York Court of Appeals, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2019 NY Slip Op 1656, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-garray-nyappdiv-2019.