People v. Garrasi

266 A.D.2d 934, 697 N.Y.S.2d 536, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11961

This text of 266 A.D.2d 934 (People v. Garrasi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Garrasi, 266 A.D.2d 934, 697 N.Y.S.2d 536, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11961 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

—Motion for change of venue denied. Memorandum: We conclude that defendant has not met his burden of demonstrating that there is reasonable cause to believe that a fair and impartial trial can[935]*935not be had in Erie County (see, CPL 230.20 [2]). If it develops during voir dire that a fair and impartial jury cannot be drawn, an appropriate motion may then be made. The request for relief is premature (see, People v Mateo, 239 AD2d 965; see generally, People v DiPiazza, 24 NY2d 342). Present — Pine, J. P., Lawton, Hayes, Hurlbutt and Balio, JJ. (Filed Oct. 4, 1999.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. DiPiazza
248 N.E.2d 412 (New York Court of Appeals, 1969)
People v. Mateo
239 A.D.2d 965 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
266 A.D.2d 934, 697 N.Y.S.2d 536, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11961, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-garrasi-nyappdiv-1999.